1989 Honda CRX review from UK and Ireland
"Great sports car that Honda should have carried on with, like the Toyota MR2"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Had to change the driver side outer CV joint (I also need to do the passenger side as this is on its way out too).
* Good indication that mechanical parts on Honda wear evenly.
Had to replace radiator - well easy to do this.
Change tyres and brakes like on any car.
The heater does not work!!!
General comments?
For a unmodified 1989 car, I have tried to see the fastest it would go (like what I do with all cars). I got over 130 miles per hour with the CRX - and it still had a little more to go - this is excellent for a a car that is nearly 20 years old, and all I did was change the spark plugs and air filter.
I have thicker tyres (205/45) rather than the standard 185/65. When doing speeds over 100mph I would strongly recommend you put the thickest tyres on to offer better grip and handling.
I bought this car cos the shape reminds me of the car in back to the future. Also I owned a crappy 1996 Rover 25, which has to be the worst car I even owned. This car is still faster than brand new cars on the road today - especially in the 1000-1600cc range.
** Bad points **
Rust.
Can be juicy in petrol if you put the pedal to the metal all of the time.
Insurance could be cheaper for a small car like this.
The car is a little flimsy - i.e plastic breaking inside etc.
Search for New and Used Honda CRXs available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 1989 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 138000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 150000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 18th January, 2008 |





