Similar Chevrolet S-10 reviews

2001
Neutral Face

S-10 LS

Compared to the 1988 S10, I am very disappointed in my 2002 S10

113 words
Happy Face

S-10 LS Ext. Cab

A very nice ride

104 words
Neutral Face

S-10 LS ZR2

This is a very poorly engineered vehicle

94 words
Happy Face

S-10 LS

It's not bad compared to most of the new junk out there

92 words
Sad Face

S-10 Crew cqpm 4x4

Total waste of metal and rubber.

91 words
Happy Face

S-10 LS Extended Cab 4x4

Dependable light duty truck

76 words
Happy Face

S-10 ZR2 LS Extended Cab

Excellent truck for everyone, on and off the road

75 words
All Chevrolet S-10 reviews

2001 Chevrolet S-10 LS review from North America

"It's not bad compared to most of the new junk out there"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Well I'm not going to bad mouth the S10 too bad.

In the 2.2L S10, the transmission is weak and will break. It makes less gas mileage than the V6, and makes half the power.

I keep seeing people say they stall out. That is the ignition control module going out.

Other than that, it's a great little truck as new cars go, and if you're thinking about getting one, make sure it's a V6 with a manual transmission.

General comments?

On single cab, if you're a tall person, you will hate the seats.

Comment on this review RSS Feed

More Chevrolet S-10 reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Model Year2001
First year of ownership2007
Most recent year of ownership2008
Engine and transmission 2.2L Automatic
Performance marks 1/10
Reliability marks 4/10
Comfort marks 2/10
Dealer Service marks 0/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 1/10
Distance when acquired98000 miles
Most recent distance103000 miles
Previous carChevrolet S-10
Date of Entry 24th March, 2008

All Chevrolet S-10 reviews