1992 Volvo 240 review from North America
"Sucked"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
This car sucked.
Loved the ride and handling and did great in the snow.
Loved the styling.
It was in the shop every 3-4 months.
I bought it because it was supposed to be reliable. Not so much.
Parts were expensive.
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model Year | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 10/10 |
| Reliability marks | 0/10 |
| Comfort marks | 9/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 0/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 145000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 245000 miles |
| Previous car | Buick LeSabre |
| Date of Entry | 7th April, 2008 |