1998 Chevrolet Malibu review from North America
"Awesome, reliable, nice riding car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
It had the water pump replaced, and leaking intake manifold gasket replaced ($$).
The brakes were done 2 times, and new tires, but this car was very reliable and sturdy.
General comments?
If we had winds of around 120 km/hr (which happens often where I live), this car stood still at lights etc. and did not blow around. That is one of the reasons it needs brakes frequently, because it is a heavy fantastic riding car.
I would buy another one in a second. They handle well and are good on gas if you don't have a lead foot.
I think many people have put derogatory comments about the 1998 Malibu because they drive it hard... 5 fuel pumps?? Come on! After one, I'd figure it was my driving... I never had to replace even one fuel pump on my Malibu.
Words to think about - get some driving lessons to learn how to drive properly and not beat the hell out of your car or buy a V8 - then you'll know what gas consumption really is all about. You'll lose the lead foot in a hurry :)
Recommended reviews
  | What a piece of junk! |
| 1997 - Malibu LS 3.1L V6 155-hp Not such a bad choice, but see if you can verify its maintenance history before buying one |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 1998 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1L V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 10/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 124500 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 173500 kilometres |
| Previous car | Pontiac Firebird |
| Date of Entry | 19th June, 2008 |