2002 Acura TL Type-S review from North America
"Don't be fooled by the Acura name!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
3rd transmission in 122000 miles. Acura refuses to admit that they have put out a bad product.
General comments?
Reliability is horrible and Acura does not stand behind their product.
Recommended reviews
  | Great great car with a troublesome transmission |
| Excellent performer with questionable transmission |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model Year | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.2 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6/10 |
| Reliability marks | 2/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 2/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 122000 miles |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Aurora |
| Date of Entry | 11th August, 2008 |