1992 Mitsubishi Montero SR review from North America
"Rough and rugged elegance"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
CV boot (because I wasn't afraid to use her as she was intended - 4 wheeling!).
Universal joint (same reason).
Valve guide seals (a little late changing the oil).
Computer (at 140K).
AC (at 160K).
Electronic suspension (expensive to fix - avoid this if possible).
Motor too small.
A little top-heavy.
General comments?
From the beginning I took this SUV offroad - truly a testosterone machine. And ever since it has been an incredible car.
Recommended Reviews:
  | Reliable, tough SUV |
| Very good cost to reliability ratio |
All Mitsubishi Montero reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 10/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 6000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 162000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda CRX |
| Date of Entry | 9th April, 2001 |