1982 Volvo 240 Wagon review from North America
"A reliable, solid, efficient, uncomplicated, and classic vehicle"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The U joint was replaced as a condition of purchase.
Various suspension parts were replaced around 115,000 miles.
The shifter knob popped off at 140k.
The overdrive button failed 170K.
The air conditioning failed at 182K.
General comments?
The car is solid, heavy, and a bit sluggish at lower speeds. Newer models I have tried (I.e. the 1989 240DL) are a bit more sprightly and fun to drive.
The car has an incredible turning radius, better than any car I've owned except perhaps the VW Bug. It also has a narrow "track", making it more of a world class vehicle, and maneuverable than its wider siblings. It has an incredibly usable cargo space, better than the Saab 900 (although the Saab is quite good too), or the Land Rover we bought recently, and is therefore indispensable as a utility vehicle.
The interior space is airy, with an exceptional view to the sides and rear (minimal blind spots). The car is comfortable for long highway journeys, and gets good mileage.
The car has never failed to start, nor has it ever stranded anyone, at any time.
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | Never underestimate Swedish technology |
![]() ![]() | Went across the continent, gets me to work |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1994 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.8 L (?) 4 cylinder petrol in Manual |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 112000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 189000 miles |
| Previous car | Honda Civic |
| Date of Entry | 13th June, 2001 |




