1992 Toyota Starlet review from Poland
"Made Toyota replace Mercedes in my private classification as the world's best car maker"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I bought it just a couple of weeks ago for $2,700, searched for a Mercedes, but I found this one - and it had automatic transmission as I wanted - I though I'd go for it as I read before about its reliability (3- and 5-year Starlets are least likely to show faults among all cars in the world - beating Porsche and Mercedes!). Things that have gone wrong:
Insulation seems to be letting some water in through the back door in heavy rain (but no rust after 9 years of service).
It makes sounds on bumps - I don't know whether this is plastic or something else, but it's pretty loud.
General comments?
My former cars were Volvo 244 and Mercedes 123 and - most recently - 116 280SE, so you can appreciate the transition, but I am very happy with the Starlet. I am a bit of a fatalist and reliability is important for me, and this little Toyota promises to be very faithful.
It drives very well, especially in urban cycle, perhaps a little too noisy on the highway at speeds above 120 km/h, but nothing seriously annoying.
I wish it had power steering.
Fuel economy could be better - it burns some 7-8 litres per 100 km at 130 km/h.
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | 1992 - Starlet GT Turbo 1.3 16v DOHC A 0-60 pocket rocket! |
![]() ![]() | 1991 - Starlet XL 1.3 litre, 12 valve Look after it, and it looks after you |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.3 petrol Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 130000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 135000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Mercedes-Benz W123 |
| Date of Entry | 2nd July, 2001 |





