1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass SL review from North America
"A fine American motor car!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
My tires needed replaced at 3000 miles of ownership, and also my brake pads.
The engine developed a slight tapping noise due to a worn lifter, some 20w50 weight oil fixed it up and made it a bit quieter.
The exaust manifold crossover pipe developed a leak, which made the engine a little louder.
General comments?
This car is very dependable. Has run since I have had it without a problem at all in the engine, other than slight hesitation due to a bad PCV valve.
The car has run great with only simple maintenance steps (oil changes, tune up, etc). I think the 3.1 is a great engine.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.4L 24v DOHC V6 A wise choice! |
| 1991 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.1L OHV V6 Beats an Accord, hands down |
All 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 multi port FI Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 212346 miles |
| Most recent distance | 225412 miles |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Cutlass |
| Date of Entry | 2nd October, 2001 |