1996 Plymouth Neon Base review from North America
"Money pit"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Head gasket.
Transmission.
Fuel line.
Oil sending unit.
Thermostat.
Oil pan gasket.
Fogged head lamp assemblies.
General comments?
This car was supposed to be a cheap car, but it takes a lot of money to keep it going.
Recommended Reviews:
  | A decent economy car, but I wouldn't buy another. You're better off with a Sentra, Civic, or Elantra |
| 1995 - Neon Highline 2.0L SOHC Temperamental, but I love my Neon! |
All 1996 Plymouth Neon reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 1996 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 SOHC Automatic |
| Performance marks | 2/10 |
| Reliability marks | 1/10 |
| Comfort marks | 3/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 67686 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet S-10 |
| Date of Entry | 19th December, 2001 |