1992 Nissan 100NX review from Norway
"Semi-convertible fun!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I find that the paint on my car is rather poor. I have a few rust spots here and there, but the reason may be the previous owner/owners lack of maintanance and polish.
General comments?
It's a fun car! It has less power than I would like, but it really is a fun car to drive. It handles very well. The fact that it looks good is no drawback either.
Recommended reviews
  | A sheep in wolf's clothing, but fun |
| A good looking, well built, sports (doesn't scare your pants off) coupe |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 155000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 168000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Daihatsu Charade |
| Date of Entry | 13th January, 2002 |