1992 Ford Taurus LX review from North America
"Cheap Wheels - Not too reliable"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission
Planetary gears wore out, paid $1300 dollars
Coolant Hose to the tranmission broke.
A/C
Older A/C so it was really expensive to repair.
Could use more power.
General comments?
I would not buy another Taurus again. If you go for this car, you will realize really soon that when they made this car, they never took into account that you might have to repair them later.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Taurus Wagon GL 3.0 Liter V6 A car for ones who likes to tinker around |
| A definate bagain for my uses, and hope it helps you out too! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 123000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 158000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 16th April, 2002 |