1992 Ford Taurus GL 3.0 review from North America
"Comfortable good value car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Considering the car had done 194,000 miles when I got it, very little went wrong.
I replaced the brake pads and tires, but that is just general wear and tear.
The only things that broke are the windshield washer pump and one of the rear window motors.
Also I had to replace 1 motor mount.
Not bad for a 200,000 mile car!
General comments?
I have been very pleased with this car. I would certainly buy another.
It has never let me down during the 16,000 miles I owned it.
I've taken it on long trips with confidence in its performance and reliability.
Average gas mileage is about 25 city and about 32 highway which is not bad I think for an old 3.0 V6.
It is very comfortable to drive, I drove 620 miles one day and got out the car feeling like I had only driven maybe about 100 miles.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Taurus Wagon GL 3.0 Liter V6 A car for ones who likes to tinker around |
| A definate bagain for my uses, and hope it helps you out too! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 10/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 194000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 212000 miles |
| Previous car | Nissan Sentra |
| Date of Entry | 28th June, 2002 |