1992 Chevrolet Lumina Z34 review from North America
"An attractive car with good performance, although it is expensive on repairs.."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Front brakes wear out relatively quickly on this model (every 14k miles or so)
Alternator is expensive to replace due to length of time needed to remove and re-install (replaced at 50k miles)...
Build quality not up to imports.
General comments?
The engine and transmission are solid; the car feels stable at highway speeds, giving the driver a feeling of confidence.
The cloth seats have held up well in the 10 years I've owned the vehicle, but the build quality is only so-so. For example, when you shut the doors on this car, they do not have the solid feel of mid-size Japanese imports.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Lumina Euro Coupe 3.1 V6 Typical problems for a car of its age, but a very good quality car overall |
| 1991 - Lumina 3.1 Euro/ 3.4 Z34 3.1 & 3.4 The best ECONO-CRUISER ever made!!! |
All 1992 Chevrolet Lumina reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4 Twin Dual Overhead Cam Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 4 miles |
| Most recent distance | 53000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 8th July, 2002 |