1992 Geo Metro review from North America
"Good on gas"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Overall the car has not been that bad. I had to have the clutch cable replaced about two thousand km after I purchased the car. I also had to have the rear wheel bearing replaced. Other than that, most of the other repairs where done on the car before I purchased it.
General comments?
It's not a bad car, however there are definitely lemon models. I guess the biggest upside is the savings on gas!
Recommended reviews
  | 1992 - Metro LX 1.0 litre 3 cylinder A fun, cheap and economical little commuter |
| 1991 - Metro Base 1.0 Liter 3 Cylinder An extremely reliable, fun and economical machine! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | Manual |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 142000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 166000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 21st July, 2002 |