1990 Ford Capri SA review from Australia and New Zealand
"Looks great and fun to drive, but defiantly not a sports car."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Fuel gauge broken at around 140,000 km.
Often idles at around 500 RPM, shaking terribly.
One of the pop-up headlights had dirty contacts - it wouldn't go down until a mechanic cleaned them.
Passenger side window will only go down from the drivers side control.
Indicator/light stalk is oddly sensitive to any forward pressure and can flash the high beams when trying to indicate at night.
Both inside door pulls have fallen off.
Glove box handle broken off.
Electric mirrors sound as if they are about to burn out.
General comments?
The Capri was based on the Ford laser so mechanically they are quite reliable.
I have the Automatic model. It's a 3-speed unit and is rather fuel in-efficient.
61kw is not much power and the car must be revved very hard to extract any kind of performance. The engine also lacks torque so ascending a steep hill can be a painful experience. The turbo models are much, much quicker, but unfortunately they were never available with an auto transmission.
Despite its bad points, I do really like this car. Its fun in the summer time, looks great and is good to drive especially in city traffic.
A better buy would be a series II model from 91-onwards. They had a much zippier twin cam engine and a 4-speed auto.
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 injected Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 140000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 160000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Ford Laser |
| Date of Entry | 6th August, 2002 |



