1997 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"Very poor"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Front brakes gone at 90000 km. Rear brakes at 95000 km. front hubs and bearings at 123000km.
General comments?
This car is not what they say it is, very disappointing.
Recommended reviews
  | Beware of repair costs; every little item requires major shop time |
| A decent car with a serious case of planned obsolescence |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5/10 |
| Reliability marks | 6/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 79000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 124000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Corsica |
| Date of Entry | 10th September, 2002 |