1985 Volvo 240 review from Netherlands
"Value for money, a way to make your life simple"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
In fact this model didn't exist. When I got it the engine was totally worn out. The space between the pistons and the cylinders was quite suitable as a mailbox, newspaper size. I started to replace the original 1900 engine (B19K) for a engine of an 740 (B200K). There was very much work to do to make the engibne suitable for the 240. We had to remove the ignition from the back of the engine and put another type in the place where it has to be on a 240. We did a lot of modifing on the igniton, the carburetor and the vacuum system. When it all was tuned the car ran about 200 kilometres an hour. We put Koni load adjusters instead of the original shock absorbers on the back and so on. And it still looked like a standard 240!
The car could run on petrol and on Liquid Gas (LPG). When I look through the years the total cost of ownership was just 22 Eurocent per kilometer!! Off course, doing the maintenence almost by myself it's not quite fair in comparision with a car that regularly is visiting the garage, but subtract the amount of money for the costs which are not the costs of the spare parts and there's the truth..!
I kept a database of evry repair and all the spare parts needed. Some extraordinairy facts turned up. At 580.00 kilometers the cylinder head needed a revision, I repaced the gearbox for a second hand one at 520.000 kilometers and we replaced the floor of the car underneath the front seats. This was due to a leaking rubber seal on the place where the electrical wiring came into the interior. I replaced at that time also the electical wiring on and around the engine. This was a poor construction, due to the temperature of the engine the isolation was just crumbs. I made new cables around the engine on the body with cables from the body to the engine. Much better. In later types like the 940 Volvo did the same thing. Following the maintenance scheme oil changes, changes of spark plugs, belts and so on were replaced. Never one problem. I found out one thing, just like the former Volvo's I owned. Spare waterpumps don't last longer than 20.000 to 30.000kilometers. Only the original Volvo waterpump last longer than 180.000 kilometers. Using original spareparts is essential to good functioning. Third party gaskets always caused trouble, only original brakepads or pads from Lucas (wich are made under the name Volvo too) were satisfying. The best tires for overall comfort and safety turnmed out to be Kleber tires.
I'dve liked to make at least one million kilometers with this car, but my White Lady died in an unfortunate accident in wich she saved the life of her owner. There were three cars fully destroyed, I was the only one who came out healthy, with not even a scratch. The front and the back of the of the car took the trouble, the doors opened and closed as like new.
There was to much repair to do, so I bought a 940, but this special one, which made 50.000 kilometers a year without serious troubles on the road will last in my memory. The 240 is one of the safest and greatest cars I know.
General comments?
Great seats, wich had to be replaced on time (at 450.000 kilometers)
Recommended reviews
![]() | One of the best options if you're looking for reliability and safety |
![]() ![]() | In a word; if it wasn’t so boring – I would own this car or its likeness forever |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1993 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2001 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 Manual |
| Performance marks | 10/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 276430 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 680608 kilometres |
| Previous car | Volvo 245 |
| Date of Entry | 5th November, 2002 |


