Similar Dodge Lancer reviews

1987
Sad Face

Lancer

You Get What You Pay For With The Lancer

288 words
Happy Face

Lancer Sport

Dodge's Sport/Luxury Sedan

123 words
Neutral Face

Lancer

I personally think the Dodge Lancer was a great car in history, and they should continue make them

108 words
1986
Happy Face

Lancer ES

Not an EVO, but still a trip!

106 words
1985
Neutral Face

Lancer LS

A high performer, but a big fixer - the harder you drive the more you fix

106 words
Sad Face

Lancer 5 door sedan hatchback

Not so much the car, but the dealer that sucks

46 words
Happy Face

Lancer

25 words
All Dodge Lancer reviews

1986 Dodge Lancer ES review from North America

"Not an EVO, but still a trip!"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

After putting up with quite a bit of abuse, the stock transmission went out. It was replaced with a new unit and has been acting fine.

The engine was rebuilt (cracked block) at 220,000 miles.

The turbo is VERY tempermental- sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but dealers and independent mechanics alike have no idea what's wrong.

The clear-coat has begun to oxidize and strip off severely.

General comments?

My first car. I love it to death. Excellent for a four-door, four cylinder car.

I'm addicted to the whistle of a turbocharger now, and the engine is very easily modified due to it's commonality across the Dodge/Chrysler line.

3 comments RSS Feed

More Dodge Lancer reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 2.2L Turbocharged Automatic
Performance marks 6/10
Reliability marks 7/10
Comfort marks 5/10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9/10
Distance when acquired190000 miles
Most recent distance280000 miles
Date of Entry 8th November, 2002

All Dodge Lancer reviews