1993 Eagle Vision TSi review from North America
"Stay away from Chrysler.."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The car die suddenly and no mechanics can figured out what is the problem.
Trying to pinpoint the problem so far the following components has been changed: 2 times the crankshaft sensor, the camshaft sensor, ignition pack, harness wires and the ignition-injection electronic module and the problem still persist.
Transmission shift abruptly due to chronic design deficiencies of the electronic control module.
General comments?
It is hard for me to understand how Chrysler is still in business after a long traditions of producing car like this.
The only good thing about this vehicle is the style and that was the trap in which I fell into.
The reliability is so inexistent that a Lada by comparison is a Rolls Royce.
I'm very curious to know what percentage of people buying a Chrysler product buy Chrysler again.
The quality of the dealer service is inexistent as well, I think any 10 years old kid knows about mechanic much more of this guys that you have to pay $90 per hour.
Never ever again an other American car, my next one will be a Nissan Maxima.
Recommended reviews
  | Dependable, economical and really sexy |
| 1992 - Vision TSi 3.5L DOHC 24v V6 Get a 3.5L Vision, Concorde, or Intrepid! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.5 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 0/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 148000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 195000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Oldsmobile Achieva |
| Date of Entry | 6th December, 2002 |