1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme SL review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I purchased the car with 88K miles.
92K: Alternator died. With 3.4L this will cost about $500-600.
96K: Radiator developed a crack between the coolant core and the tranny core, tranny fluid in the coolant is a bad thing.
100K: Some sort of observation cap on the engine block started leaking oil, still does.
108K: Timing belt broke. Again, on the 3.4L this is costs about $1000, luckily its a non-interference engine (no valve damage will occur)
115K: Alternator died again.
General comments?
Would I buy for Olds again? NFW, I may never buy another American car.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.4L 24v DOHC V6 A wise choice! |
| 1991 - Cutlass Supreme SL 3.1L OHV V6 Beats an Accord, hands down |
All 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Engine and transmission | 3.4L V6 |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 3/10 |
| Comfort marks | 6/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4/10 |
| Date of Entry | 25th January, 2000 |