1992 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"This is a high quality car, with good gas mileage and reliabilty"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
A $60 oxygen sensor was replaced at 100000 miles.
Drive shaft broke at 200000.
Rear brake cylinder needed to be replaced at 80000.
-
General comments?
This car is awesome aside from the rough ride. I have spent about $300 in non-related "normal" wear components since I have owned it. The tranmission is just starting to become jerky now with over 200000 miles on it, and it doesn't always occur. The car has always rode a little rough, but it does outperform our 2001 Taurus. I get approx. 30 mpg yet to this dat with it on the highway.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 1992 - Taurus Wagon GL 3.0 Liter V6 A car for ones who likes to tinker around |
| A definate bagain for my uses, and hope it helps you out too! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1995 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 6/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 70000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 220000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Taurus |
| Date of Entry | 11th October, 2003 |