1996 Mercury Grand Marquis GS review from North America
"For the Money it CAN"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Intake Manifold Cracked (595.00 installed)
Brakes (emergency) Malfunctioned 295.00.
Shox didn't absorb 110.00 Installed.
Ball Joints were worn out.
Tie Rods needed to go cause could align
800 bux for the ball joints and ends plus a brake job thrown in and the Bushings.
Bushings dry rotted.
Two Power window regulators (120 each)
General comments?
I felt compelled to update my previous 1996 entry (Cuke on Wheels) because this hunk of junk has totally impressed me. Most of the stuff listed above is just wear and tear stuff. As for the engine and transmission I can officially say that they are indeed bullet proof. Talk about reliability this thing performed admirably in that Blizzard of 2002/3 here in the DC area without a hitch and has been absolutely ultra reliable.
My hat goes off whoever designed and made this taxi wannabe because its been paid off for 3 years now and the only thing goes in are maintenance items. I drive about 28k miles a year and I promised myself when this thing hits 200K I will treat myself and get some tint. LOL.
Later.
Recommended reviews
  | 1996 - Grand Marquis GS 4.6 Liter V8 Great car that no one knows about |
| 1995 - Grand Marquis LS 4.6 SOHC Good, reliable, solid car, it's just not my style |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.6L V8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 9/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 0/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 60000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 150000 miles |
| Previous car | Plymouth Voyager |
| Date of Entry | 23rd October, 2003 |