1999 Alfa Romeo 146 1.6 Twin Spark review from Italy
"An Alfa is a car for a true enthusiast who can look beyond the quirks"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I bought it used in September 2001 with 9,000 kilometers on the odometer. On delivery it was apparent that the front brake rotors were scored or warped as both sides made a loud grinding noise on brake application. This problem was fixed by a local Alfa shop who's owner is also a big Alfisti. He explained 2nd gear synchronizer is useless on these cars and he was right. To this day, second gear required double clutching prior to engagement. Mostly on downshift, but occasionally on a higher rpm up shift. There was a strange rattle in one of the rear doors, but I learned to live with it.
General comments?
I've driven BMWs, Mercedes and Porsches all my life. And there is no doubt that they are superior cars. But Alfas have a subjective quality that cannot be quantified. It is the scream of the engine at 7,000 rpm (yes, the 1.6 liter has a 7,000 rpm redline). Or the quirky layout of the interior. My point is, despite the clear technical superiority of the German makes, Alfas have a soul. My girlfriend had a 156 2.4 litre turbodiesel that also has this characteristic.
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | 1999 - 146 Sport 1.4 Twin Spark Great looks and drive - crap reliability |
![]() | Good car but you need to be a technician to own it |
All 1999 Alfa Romeo 146 reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6 gas Manual |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 9000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 23000 kilometres |
| Previous car | BMW 3 Series |
| Date of Entry | 28th October, 2003 |




