2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK 240 review from UK and Ireland
"Quality befitting this famous marque"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
There is some unexpected corrosion on the alloy wheels.
The paint chips far too easily.
There is more wear on the leather seats than I was expecting from a Mercedes.
Otherwise faultless. Not even a squeak from the leather.
General comments?
The car seems to hesitate for a fraction on the accelerator and this is very disconcerting, especially when reversing.
I'm very impressed with the quietness, and performance - the CLK manages to be far more 'sporting' to drive than my BMW 740 was yet without losing too much refinement. Seating position is excellent and flexible.
Hardly any oddments space becomes a pain so buy one with a built-in 'phone.
Lots of programmable options so take time to read the 500 page owners manual.
Gorgeous lines are enhanced in summer when you can drop all windows - because doors are frame-less it feels like a convertible. This feature is why I bought the car as I once had a 500 SEC to which it compares well.
I'm proud to own the car, it's good looking and works out to be pretty good value as it's been cheap to run and although expensive to buy it has held its value well. I'd have lost more by buying a coupe for half the price.
Search for New and Used Mercedes-Benz CLKs available in the UK
Click here to advertise your car
Recommended Reviews:
![]() ![]() | CLK is great, read this review, nice car |
![]() ![]() | Great car |
All 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.6 petrol Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 25000 miles |
| Previous car | BMW 7 Series |
| Date of Entry | 17th November, 2003 |



