1990 Chevrolet Astro review from North America
"Great work truck"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Typical high mileage failures. Alternator, brakes, rotors, battery, couple of tune-ups.
Idler arm failed twice. Second failure was due to improper installation of the first one. Mechanic installed bushing on back wards.
Cigarette lighter on the same circuit as the ABS brakes. Short in the lighter caused a misdiagnosis of the brakes by a mechanic.
Rear differential failed. You should check your seals on your differential for leaks from time to time.
General comments?
Very good work vehicle. Hauled a lot of weight and towed a cargo trailer. Never broke down on the job.
Handles poorly, not maneuverable, top heavy, brakes poorly. Not a safe vehicle to drive and very bad in the snow. Designed as a mini work van.
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 1993 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.0L V 6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 9/10 |
| Comfort marks | 2/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 81000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 238000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 5th December, 2003 |