1999 Lexus ES300 review from North America
"A ticking time bomb"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The transmission failed at 91,000 miles, necessitating a complete replacement.
The original equipment tires had to be replaced three times within the first three years that I owned the vehicle.
The battery has had to be replaced twice.
General comments?
The car handles well.
The car is comfortable to ride in.
The interior is fairly roomy.
There were virtually no mechanical problems with the car for the first three years that I owned it.
However, during that three-year period, the original equipment tires had to be replaced three times, and the battery twice.
Since the car has gone off warranty, the transmission has failed completely, the rear main engine seal has had to be replaced, and the front struts are also due for replacement.
Recommended reviews
  | Nice economical daily driver |
| Love every single drive! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 5/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 20 miles |
| Most recent distance | 91000 miles |
| Previous car | Toyota Celica |
| Date of Entry | 17th December, 2003 |