1991 Geo Storm Base review from North America
"This car is a great low budget performer."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The windshield is cracked. This was caused by a stone, but removing a used one has proven to be very difficult, even for experienced auto glass professionals. I need to buy a new one for a considerable amount more money.
The speedometer is noisy.
The front driveaxles are worn out. This is a common problem to front wheel drive and four wheel drive vehicles.
General comments?
The car is light and nimble. It handles very well through moderate and high speed cornering, and is agile enough to make emergency lane changes, and dodge larger vehicle that may not be able to see it.
In my opinion, the seats are very comfortable, providing support where I need it. They are also supportive enough to keep me in place while making spirited maneuvers.
Recommended reviews
  | A car for those who think they are fast and furious, but don't have a lot of cash |
| 1990 - Storm 2+2 (Base) 1.6 SOHC Sporty, dependable, economical |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 1.6L 4 cylinder Manual |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 145415 miles |
| Most recent distance | 146103 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Monte Carlo |
| Date of Entry | 22nd December, 2003 |