1997 Ford Taurus GL review from North America
"The 1997 Ford Taurus is a sleek, serviceable, and safe vehicle that is well worth the money"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Faulty dome light.
Check engine light came on at 80,000 miles.
Fuel gauge broke at 80,000 miles. Computer needs to be reset, but the warranty had already expired.
General comments?
It was difficult for me to list things that have gone wrong with the car. I was the second owner, and the car ran great for the year that I drove it.
If you're looking for a safe vehicle, I would definitely suggest the Taurus. A recent accident that demolished my car left me with minor bruises only. Air bag deployment was right on, and my seatbelt kept me from going into the windshield, which did not shatter.
The factory sound system was nice.
Cruise control worked until the end.
The interior is easy to clean.
Recommended Reviews:
  | Beware of repair costs; every little item requires major shop time |
| A decent car with a serious case of planned obsolescence |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 9/10 |
| Reliability marks | 10/10 |
| Comfort marks | 10/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 87000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 104000 miles |
| Previous car | Hyundai Accent |
| Date of Entry | 19th March, 2004 |