2001 Ford Explorer XLT Sport review from North America
"An SUV done right!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
No problems to date.
General comments?
This is a great SUV for the price. Yes it is a SUV so you will pay more in gas, but on the highway it is a lot better than a pick-up. My Ranger would only get about 22 mpg however my Explorer gets about 27 mpg. The wear and tear is great I have leather seats and being in North Dakota I figured the would be cracking and all I do is treat them right before the winter and they haven't even started to crack.
The performance is great with the 4.0L V-6. When I want to get up and go it is more than willing to accommodate my wishes.
Recommended Reviews:
  | 2001 - Explorer Sport Trac 4.0 SOHC A dismal lemon |
| 2000 - Explorer XLT 4.0L OHC V6 There are better choices |
All 2001 Ford Explorer reviews
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.0 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 38000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 51000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Ranger |
| Date of Entry | 18th April, 2004 |