Similar Ford Ranger reviews

2001

Ranger EDGE

Generally good vehicle

25 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger XLT EDGE

A strong engine, smooth feel, awesome look

21 words
2000
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger XLT 2wd

Great Light Truck. I love it

442 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger

Reliable Workhorse

372 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger XLT 4x4 offroad

This is the best truck value, but the worst dealer service

321 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger Edge 3.0

A reliable AMERICAN truck!!

315 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Ranger XLT

Reliable mid-sized/compact truck

245 words
All Ford Ranger reviews

2000 Ford Ranger review from North America

"Reliable Workhorse"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Passenger-side airbag disable switch failed in the first month.

Negative battery terminal disintegrated at 52000 miles due to dissimilar metals in contact plus acid overspray. I corrected by replacing both battery cables with aftermarket variety with conventional lead clamps to assure reliability.

General comments?

Very good to excellent overall. Few problems, very reliable.

Good fuel economy (averages around 26 mpg) especially when considering the 3250 lb curb weight and the inherently-poor aerodynamic drag coefficient of pickup trucks.

But you must use at least 89 octane fuel, or even 92 octane when fully-loaded or pulling a small trailer. Contrary to the owner's manual claim that this vehicle will run satisfactorily on 87 octane, the engine will clatter like a jackhammer when using regular gasoline at 50 to 60 mph. This pre-ignition (or detonation or spark knock, as it may be known) seems to be characteristic as my 1990 Ranger did likewise. I suspected that the cylinders had become coked-up, but inspection revealed clean piston crowns and cylinder head so I added a water-injection system which corrected the problem and gave a slight improvement in fuel economy.

To me the L4 engine seems to be a near-ideal balance between power and low fuel consumption/greenhouse gas emission. I suspect some would be dissatisfied with the acceleration, as it is difficult to pass the many slow, elderly drivers in my locale.

Also characteristic is the brake shudder. The front-end shakes on fairly-heavy braking, such as a stoplight on a favoring grade. Disks are up to spec, just seems to be insufficient rigidity of the front suspension. 1990 Ranger had the same fault.

Hotchkiss-drive rear suspension causes a slight 'clunk' or 'jerk' when opening or shutting the throttle.

Very quiet ride, much less road noise transmitted to the body than most sedans due to the separate body/frame construction.

High ground clearance good on rutted, dirt roads and allows oil changes without jacking up, but at the cost of poor swerve-ability in an emergency. As with all pickups and SUVs, 60 mph is the absolute maximum speed at which it should be driven and this only during daylight, fair weather driving.

A good choice for deliveries, camping, construction, fishing trips. A poor choice for interstate and turnpike high-speed distance driving.

1 comment

Recommended Reviews:

USA FlagCanada Flag

2000 - Ranger XLT 2wd I 2.5L

Great Light Truck. I love it

USA FlagCanada Flag

2000 - Ranger XLT 4x4 offroad 4.0L

This is the best truck value, but the worst dealer service

All 2000 Ford Ranger reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission L4 2.3 Manual
Performance marks 7/10
Reliability marks 9/10
Comfort marks 8/10
Dealer Service marks 4/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 9/10
Distance when acquired6 miles
Most recent distance73405 miles
Previous carFord Ranger
Date of Entry 22nd April, 2004

All Ford Ranger reviews