Similar Lotus Elise reviews

2000
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise 160 Sport

89 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise Millennium

Fantastic fun for very little money

78 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise 111S

OK it's a cliche but true - THE no-compromise sports car

51 words
1999
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise

Awesome to drive, but quality and durability disappoint

431 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise S1 111S

Near super-car performance for Mondeo money

245 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise Standard

The border line of sports car and super car

234 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

Elise Standard

Good noisy economical fun

201 words
All Lotus Elise reviews

1999 Lotus Elise review from UK and Ireland

"Awesome to drive, but quality and durability disappoint"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Cable for boot/engine cover release (the only method of opening it) broke.

Leaks like a sieve in anything heavier than drizzle.

Strong smell of petrol when the tank contains more than an indicated 30 litres.

Car looks and feels generally tired at 50k. Rattles and squeaks everywhere, the odd clonk from underneath, steering not as sharp as it used to be.

Sudden clutch failure at 11,000 miles.

Gear linkage became detached.

General comments?

The K-series engine hasn't missed a beat, consumes no oil or water and returns 42 mpg average. Lacks top end welly, but the acceleration up to about 80 mph is enough to see off most other things on four wheels. Lotus dealers are attentive and professional, but seem to be capitalising on charging Lotus servicing costs on what is a bog standard Rover engine. The chassis may be advanced and clever, but it doesn't need any more maintenance than a conventional one.

Handling is astonishing. Not as forgiving as my old MX-5, but with an immediacy and directness like no other car, and with limits that really take some exploring on the public road. Best steering I've ever experienced. Unassisted brakes are terrifying on first encounter (if you've ever been towed you'll know), but are fine once you get used to them. The difference in fun and sharpness between this and the MX-5 is like the difference between the MX-5 and my previous Golf again. It's that good. Get it on a track and it's in its element, as am I for that matter.

Shame about the poor build quality. Feels very "loose" recently with many of the interior fittings either broken, worn or loose. Some play around the dead ahead on the steering which wasn't there 10,000 miles ago. Disappointing after a (much cheaper) MX-5 which did 88,000 miles and still felt as good as new. Hood has never been truly watertight although it's so bad now, it's barely worth putting it up. If Mazda can make an unfailingly watertight hood on a £14,000 car, why can't Lotus on a £20,000 one?

Once you're in the car (no small feat with the roof up, it's like getting through a letterbox), it's surprisingly comfortable. Noise levels are high-ish, but pleasant in quality, and the seats support well. Equipment is poor in order to maximise weight saving, although I think the minimalism is a key part of the car's appeal. It has a decent heater and a stereo - what more do you need?

If it were better built, I'd buy another tomorrow, but as it stands now, I'll probably not.

4 comments

United Kingdom Flag Search for New and Used Lotus Elises available in the UK

Click here to advertise your car

Recommended reviews

UK FlagIreland Flag

2000 - Elise 160 1.8

Waste of money

UK FlagIreland Flag

1999 - Elise S1 111S 1.8

Near super-car performance for Mondeo money

All 1999 Lotus Elise reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
First year of ownership1999
Most recent year of ownership2003
Engine and transmission 1.8 16v petrol Manual
Performance marks 9/10
Reliability marks 4/10
Comfort marks 8/10
Dealer Service marks 9/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8/10
Distance when acquired3 miles
Most recent distance50000 miles
Previous carMazda MX5
Date of Entry 9th May, 2004

All Lotus Elise reviews