Similar Jaguar X-Type reviews

2003
USA FlagCanada Flag

X-Type 3.0

It is frustrating

81 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

X-Type

This car sucks!

75 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

X-Type 3.0 SE

A great car to drive let down by it's build quality and fuel consumption

71 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

X-Type 2.5

This car is not punk; it holds its own very well

66 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

X-Type SE

Drives like a dream, a bit too thirsty though

64 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

X-Type SE

What a Jag should be - you just want to keep driving it

63 words
UK FlagIreland Flag

X-Type SE

Little sporty limousine

42 words
All Jaguar X-Type reviews

2003 Jaguar X-Type 2.5 review from North America

"This car is not punk; it holds its own very well"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Nothing to this point. The car has run perfectly.

General comments?

This car really runs so hold on to it. Accelleration and sterring are absolutely responsive to the actions of the driver.

Prepare to spend a lot of time (and money) at the gas station. The car goes through a tank of premium gas like a camel goes through a bucket of water. I'm refueling every other day.

1 comment

Recommended reviews

USA FlagCanada Flag

2003 - X-Type 3.0 3.0

Headturning luxury sedan with spirit

USA FlagCanada Flag

2002 - X-Type AWD 3.0L

This car is of extremely poor quality, and is very unreliable

All 2003 Jaguar X-Type reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 2.5 Automatic
Performance marks 10/10
Reliability marks 10/10
Comfort marks 10/10
Dealer Service marks  
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 4/10
Distance when acquired12850 miles
Most recent distance14500 miles
Previous carPontiac Grand Prix
Date of Entry 8th June, 2004

All Jaguar X-Type reviews