1988 Toyota Celica Zr (SR?) review from Australia and New Zealand
"Easy to drive, Fast and Cheap"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Radiator blocked.
Exhaust rusted through (was aftermarket though.)
Knocking noise coming from the rear of the car (unknown cause - possibly CV joints??)
Rust hole in boot lid beside window sprayer.
Leaking from the boot and window seals on occasion.
Grinding noise when down-shifting to second gear at higher Revs.
General comments?
This car is awesome.
It has somewhat retro styling, giving it an aggressive look. Something that definitely gets attention, especially after a few mods.
Only a few minor problems have meant that this car has been relatively cheap to maintain - being my pride and joy, this isn't a problem to me.
The Celica goes easy on the petrol and I have managed to drive about 200 K's on a full tank (costing about $50NZ)
It is quick off the mark, even though it is only powered by a 3s-FE engine (the 'economy' engine) and I have managed to keep up with all sorts of V-Tec Integras and Preludes. After a decent Exhaust was fitted, and a PoD filter, the car is competition for non V-Tec Hondas.
This type of Celica is front-wheel-drive, but still handles beautifully - with very little under-steer at reasonable cornering speeds.
The power steering is very direct and feels quite 'thick.'
All in all, I would have to say that as a first car, it is hard to beat the reliability and performance of the Celica, and after getting a full license simply upgrade to the GT-Four model (turbocharged 4wheel drive!).
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | 1989 - Celica GTR 4WS 2.0 DOHC Reliable car that looks great for a 1989 |
![]() ![]() | A very advanced car for the year it was made, and very fun to drive |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0 petrol Manual |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 7/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 211000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 221000 kilometres |
| Date of Entry | 25th August, 2004 |



