Similar Dodge Grand Caravan reviews

1996
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan SE

I love it, and would buy another in a heartbeat

421 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan ES

It is a waste of money and I will not recommend a Chrysler product to anyone

420 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan LE

Great buy for the money

408 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan SE

Form and function unfortunately don't equal quality

399 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan LS

Crappy...it's not just a fish!!

361 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan SE

Solid car, should last 150,000 miles with regular service -- great for families

318 words
USA FlagCanada Flag

Grand Caravan ES

They still can't make 'em like the Japanese

240 words
All Dodge Grand Caravan reviews

1996 Dodge Grand Caravan SE review from North America

"Form and function unfortunately don't equal quality"

What things have gone wrong with the car?

Transmission was repaired on three separate occasions, the first around 70,000km, a shredded gear was bouncing around. Then around 130,000km more transmission problems this time not under warranty and creating a huge expense. The third transmission problem @ around 180,000km was the end of our ownership of the minivan, surprisingly traded in on another Caravan.

Immediately after regular servicing, the minivan actually choked to death because the air filter was so clogged (shouldn't they check these things) and the Caravan had to be towed, fix cost was obviously negligible.

A/C Condenser was replaced under warranty.

One other really odd problem was somehow the oil pan was leaking directly into the incoming air for the cabin. Fixed under warranty involved disassembly of much of the dash. The car smelled like a garage inside (just stronger!).

General comments?

The decision to buy the 1996 Grand Caravan was based on the pleasant experience we had with the 1988 Grand Voyager (3.0 LE), we owned the Grand Voyager from 1988-1996, and aside from some PDL problems early and under warranty really didn't take the car in for much of anything.

The 3.3L engine is unfortunately pretty much gone from Chrysler's repetoire right now, it used to be on most Intrepids. The engine performed well, and did not have problems. The seating comfort in this thing was great. We all loved the Grand Caravan and there's no vehicle that I've driven regularly that I have more confidence in for an emergency maneuver. For a vehicle of that size the Grand Caravan got nothing short of spectacular marks in that respect.

The Transmission doesn't seem to have a defect rate on these things. They are just plain faulty. Maybe changing the transmission fluid more often would benefit. Chrysler's own service people were friendly, but ultimately incompetent at times. The air filter incident rates as inexcusable in my books.

For function and form there's no matching this thing, at least in my belief. However Chrysler's quality is simply suspect and trying on owners. Perhaps the feelings of the family could be best summed up with this. In 2002 we owned a '93 Cutlass Supreme, '96 Sable, and '96 Caravan, in that year we got rid of both of the 1996's that were ailing at that point, and the '93 Cutlass Supreme and it's 228,000km doesn't seem overly in interested in giving out so it's still on the road.

Comment on this review

Recommended reviews

USA FlagCanada Flag

1996 - Grand Caravan LE 3.8

Great buy for the money

USA FlagCanada Flag

1996 - Grand Caravan LS 3.3

Crappy...it's not just a fish!!

All 1996 Dodge Grand Caravan reviews

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Model Year1996
First year of ownership1996
Most recent year of ownership2002
Engine and transmission 3.3L V6 Automatic
Performance marks 9/10
Reliability marks 3/10
Comfort marks 9/10
Dealer Service marks 1/10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2/10
Distance when acquired12000 kilometres
Most recent distance180000 kilometres
Previous carPlymouth Grand Voyager
Date of Entry 4th November, 2004

All Dodge Grand Caravan reviews