1999 Ford Escort ZX2 review from North America
"Disapointingly Mediocre"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
-New Front Axle at 90K
-Seems like it needs new rotors every other week.
-New Alternator at 91K
-The front end of this car is horrible. I took it to three different mechanics, and none of them know what in god's name is wrong with this car. Thus, it shakes when you hit 60MPH.
-The paint on the hood is cracked.
-The headliner is already sagging horribly, and this car is a '99...
General comments?
Honestly, it's a great car for a modern day car. Most modern day cars don't last past 120K, so I guess this is a good car? I'm strictly a Volvo guy, the only reason why I have this car is because it's my dad's old hand-me down. He didn't want it anymore, so I took it. With me being an avid Volvo lover, I guess I'm a bit spoiled. So maybe this car isn't as bad as I make it out to be? I hate this sad excuse of a "clutch". It's the weakest clutch I've ever shifted. I think a 8 month hold could shift this car with ease. It's a boring car to drive, and it's not safe at all to drive. If an SUV hits you, you're toast. The steering is too sensitive, and if I sneeze the wrong way, I'll end up in a ditch. I'm appalled at the fact the headliner is sagging, and the paint is cracked. This car is a '99! It's 5 years old for crying out loud! Well, I guess it's something I should expect from an American car. It's "sporty" looking, and that's about it. I'll sacrafice looks with reliability and stick with my Volvos.
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model Year | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2000 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.0L SOHC Manual |
| Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Reliability marks | 7/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 2/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 30000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 101000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Volvo 240. |
| Date of Entry | 1st December, 2004 |


