1992 Audi 100 S review from North America
"This vehicle has better fit and finish than any Japan import of the same year."
What things have gone wrong with the car?
To date there have really been no issues, other than routine maintenance.
General comments?
This vehicle is very capable on a long trip.
The body lines and design have aged well and do not look dated.
Recommended reviews
  | A fantastic quality car, ahead of it's time |
  | A classic and faithful old friend |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.8 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 4/10 |
| Reliability marks | 5/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 6/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 130000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 137000 miles |
| Previous car | Audi 100 |
| Date of Entry | 9th August, 2005 |