1971 Chevrolet Nova review from North America
"I like it"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The seats were worn out.
It wasn't drivable when I bought, so I had to spend about $1000 in repairs before I could drive it.
The starter went bad in 1998.
The engine died at 160,000 miles. The timing chain came off and ruined the engine.
A carburetor went out in 2002, but it was a low quality rebuild.
General comments?
With stock components it can get decent gas mileage and power. Mine has gotten up to 20 mpg on the highway with a 3 speed automatic.
These are great cars for people who like to drive old cars. They are relatively light, easy to work on, and stock parts are easy to get since they interchange with so many other GM vehicles.
In stock condition they are very reliable, it has been a daily driver for most of the time I've owned it and it is also my long distance driver.
It is a joy to drive on the highway, there is nothing like going on a road trip with a V8 in a light car.
Recommended reviews
![]() ![]() | 1974 - Nova Custom 2-Door 250 CID inline 6 cylinder A very economical and dependable car, and ideal for a first car |
![]() ![]() | 1970 - Nova 230 C.I.D. straight six. Bought new, has served and will continue to serve me well, saves lives, RELIABLE <--underline |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 1971 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | 350 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 6/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Distance when acquired | 140000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 190000 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet C10 |
| Date of Entry | 25th August, 2005 |

