1996 Volvo 850 GLT review from North America
"Not worth the aggravation"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Rear Main Seal Failed, probably due to crummy PCV system.
SRS system developed fault.
CD Changer Failed.
A/C Evaporator failed.
ACC system intermittantly had fault.
Noisy brake.
General comments?
This was a good looking comfortable car. It just seemed to have a lot of problems for its age/mileage. The 2.4 liter motor was underpowered, and noisy at highway speed. The ergonomics of the car were terrible.
This car was definitely not Volvo's best work. I'd avoid this model car.
On the plus side, most of the repairs (except the evaporator which is a 24 hour job) were pretty easy to do. Timing belt and water pump were a piece of cake.
Recommended reviews
  | Not one bad thing to say.. |
| It would be hard to not see this car as one of the best overall |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model Year | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2004 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.4 I5 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5/10 |
| Reliability marks | 2/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 3/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 120000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 125000 miles |
| Previous car | SAAB 900 |
| Date of Entry | 27th January, 2006 |