1999 Lexus RX300 review from North America
"Poor considering it is supposedly high-end SUV"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Transmission failed suddenly without any warning or prior symptoms.
General comments?
The performance of this car is average only.
Not worth the price tag.
Recommended reviews
  | It is an over-priced Toyota |
| The RX300 is an excellent SUV, but seems to have reliability issues after 70K miles |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 1999 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | |
| Reliability marks | |
| Comfort marks | |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Distance when acquired | 50 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 88000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Honda Accord |
| Date of Entry | 13th March, 2006 |