1988 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe review from North America
"The '88 Turbo has tremendous power and comfort, but needs a lot of attention"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The ABS was a big problem, mainly with the cost and availability of parts. Then the turbo went out and the electronics thereafter.
In all the car requires a lot of tender loving attention. The thing is too sophisticated for the average shade tree mechanic.
I love the performance and gas mileage. I now own a 2000 Monte Carlo SuperSport because that's the closest thing that matches the '88 Turbo. I kept the turbo inspite of the problems. It's too good a car not to own.
The parts are rare and expensive, so it's more for a hobby than depending on it for everyday use.
General comments?
If you can afford it, the car is greater than most others I've owned or driven.
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| First year of ownership | 1992 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2000 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.3 turbo Manual |
| Performance marks | 8/10 |
| Reliability marks | 6/10 |
| Comfort marks | 8/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 2/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 91000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 130000 miles |
| Previous car | Ford Mustang |
| Date of Entry | 14th December, 2000 |