Daewoo Musso Review from Iran

2004 Daewoo Musso 3.2

Year of manufacture2004
First year of ownership2004
Most recent year of ownership2004
Engine and transmission 3.2 Automatic
Performance marks 3 / 10
Reliability marks 4 / 10
Comfort marks 6 / 10
Dealer Service marks 5 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 2 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.0 / 10
Distance when acquired0 kilometres
Most recent distance10000 kilometres

Summary:

A disaster

Faults:

The brake system is extremely poor.

Fuel consumption is very high.

Acceleration is poor.

General Comments:

One must drive very slowly at all times in order to avoid accidents.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 11th July, 2004

13th Sep 2004, 12:04

It is a large, tall, heavy 4x4 with an average engine not an F1 car.. you should try driving a 2.4 petrol LWB frontera, now theres a life threatening ;)

6th Mar 2012, 11:55

I have an 02 2.9 TD Musso as a work vehicle, and it's a tank!

Faults? None.

Spares required? None.

Had tyres, brake pads, lots of oil changes and lots of diesel.

Men I work with mostly have Pajeros (soft, troublesome and slow by comparison). Any time they get in with me, they can't believe how rapid it is and how good it pulls a heavy trailer. I hope people keep slating the Musso's, as it means I can keep quietly plugging along under the radar in mine. I've had Landcruisers, Fourtraks and Land Rovers in the past. I'll keep the Musso.

BTW, every mechanic and MOT tester I know says the same - "great engine in them Mussso jeeps".

Average review marks: 4.0 / 10, based on 1 review