2002 Acura RSX type s review from North America
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing.
General comments?
This is a engineering masterpieces, the engine is great and loves to be tapped to its full potential anytime you want it to, and the looks is ageless. If your thinking about the base RSX or RSX-S go for the type S please, 40 hp is a big difference, but if you get the base RSX just know you will lose in a race with me, guys in base RSX envy the Type S, so don't be the guy who kicks himself in the butt for buying a base model. And please if you have a base RSX don't try to show off to a Type S you are basically driving a hatchback civic Si, but of course a good looking one. Guys in civics, integras, accords, jettas, cobolts, focus', and neons wish they could have a Type S. The engine mods are endless and more are coming out each day. I do get a lot of stares, but I am a humble person, and never showoff to showoff, I go fast for personal reasons, like making guys in civics etc... look stupid.
Recommended reviews
| A sexy car |
| 2002 - RSX Premium 2.0L i-VTEC Great little fun-mobile |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2002 |
| Year of manufacture | 2002 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Engine and transmission | k20c Manual |
| Performance marks | |
| Reliability marks | |
| Comfort marks | |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | |
| Distance when acquired | 50000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 52000 miles |
| Previous car | Acura RSX |
| Date of Entry | 26th December, 2005 |