2000 Acura TL review from North America
"Not dependable"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Three transmissions.
General comments?
Acura was pretty dependable. but due to the transmission problems, it will be years before I buy another one.
Recommended reviews
| Great car bad Transmission |
|
| Striking a true luxury/sport/touring balance |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | No |
| Model year | 2000 |
| Year of manufacture | 1999 |
| First year of ownership | 2002 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 5 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 6 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 4 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 40000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 112000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 28th February, 2006 |