1998 Chevrolet Astro LS review from North America
"Astro-nomical costs!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I guess I would say that the Astro is fairly solid IF you get one with a generous extended factory warranty. Reliability "issues":
--> replaced front pads at 20K
--> had TWO experiences (one inside and one outside of standard factory warranty period) with "bad ignition" wires (>$450 each)
--> transmission went to mush around 35K miles (fortunately just barely within warranty period).
General comments?
Very roomy-- can accommodate lots of people / car seats (though the front seats are a bit cramped for those long legged folk). Decent acceleration. Rides high and considering its size, one at least feels safer on the road.
Considering sub-par reliability, definitely consider an extended warranty.
Recommended reviews
| This van was poorly designed and tested, and I wish the manufacturer would recall it |
|
| The Astro - not too big, not too small - just right for the family that needs a work oriented van |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1998 |
| First year of ownership | 1998 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2002 |
| Engine and transmission | 4.3L V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 4 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 4 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 909 miles |
| Most recent distance | 41000 miles |
| Previous car | Isuzu Rodeo |
| Date of Entry | 11th September, 2002 |