1991 Chevrolet Beretta GT review from North America
"A+ very good car, should be put back in the line up"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I can’t say there was very much that went wrong on the car. Mostly just battery, brakes, tires, and so on.
I did have to put a new clutch in it, but it did have over 300,000 km on it.
It still runs like new, and doesn’t burn any oil.
I would go anywhere in this car. I actually just got back from Calgary in it. And I live in Newfoundland. That was a 3 day drive, day and night.
My Beretta is a 1991 and it almost looks as good as the day it was on the showroom floor.
General comments?
For the type of car it is, I think the Beretta’s are very under rated. For the cost of buying one, they're quite fast. For its class there is not much that would keep up with this car. Including the V6 Camaro.
The car doesn’t handle the best though. It needs a little upgrading. I put a lower tire on it, and lowering springs on mine, and it made a very big difference.
Recommended reviews
| The best car I've ever owned |
|
| Very much worth every penny I have spent and very enjoyable |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1991 |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2009 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1L V6 Manual |
| Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 198000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 320000 kilometres |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Cavalier |
| Date of Entry | 18th January, 2009 |