2005 Chevrolet Classic review from North America
"This is a very nice, practical car!"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
The only negative that I have is the lack of transmission dipstick/fluid input unit.
General comments?
This car is roomy and I have sufficent leg room (I'm 6'3" with long legs).
It gets good performance for a 4-cylinder engine and it is great on gas. I can fill up for $30, and the gas mileage is tremendous!
The car is efficent and has just the right amount of features. It's not the terribly stripped down model, but its not the super luxury glamorous model either. It fits right in the middle with features.
Recommended reviews
| 2005 - Classic Standard 2.2 ecotec Superb value |
|
| 2005 - Classic 2.2L DOC 4 cylinder It's fantastic!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2005 |
| Year of manufacture | 2005 |
| First year of ownership | 2007 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Engine and transmission | 2.2L 4 Cylinder Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 7 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 10 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 45000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 46000 miles |
| Previous car | Chevrolet Corsica |
| Date of Entry | 2nd October, 2007 |