2005 Chevrolet Classic review from North America
"Excellent value"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Nothing.
General comments?
While my Nissan Sentra got better gas mileage, my Chevrolet Classic has generally cost me less to run. I haven't replaced anything but the oil in mine, so far. I plan to use only genuine parts when it comes to the coolant, brakes, etc., to keep it running smoothly. I would highly recommend this vehicle for comfort and reliability.
Recommended reviews
| 2005 - Classic 2.2L DOC 4 cylinder It's fantastic!! |
|
| Pleasantly surprised |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 2005 |
| Year of manufacture | 2004 |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Engine and transmission | Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 29000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 42000 miles |
| Previous car | Nissan Sentra |
| Date of Entry | 6th June, 2008 |