1992 Chevrolet Lumina Euro review from North America
"A good"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
I had to replace my struts. I started
with the front ones then the back ones.
I had to replace my brakes. (Twice in two and a half years.)
I replaced my exhaust.
I replaced my third brake light.
It wasn't rusting very fast, but I had to have it painted.
My door hinges worn-ed out.
I had to replace my alternator.
My temperature gage is off. It'll light up and the car isn't that hot. The fan works fine. I had it tested.
T.
General comments?
I've never had a problem starting the car in the cold winter mornings.
The performance on the highway is very nice.
It's a big car that handles like a small car.
It's roomy!
The car is easy to self-maintain. Even for a city slicker.
The engine is very reliable.
Recommended reviews
| 1992 - Lumina Euro Coupe 3.1 V6 Typical problems for a car of its age, but a very good quality car overall |
|
| 1991 - Lumina 3.1 Euro/ 3.4 Z34 3.1 & 3.4 The best ECONO-CRUISER ever made!!! |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2003 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 V6 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 3 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 195000 kilometres |
| Most recent distance | 223500 kilometres |
| Previous car | Ford F250 |
| Date of Entry | 9th May, 2003 |