1995 Chevrolet Lumina Sedan review from North America
"A reliable car"
What things have gone wrong with the car?
Battery. I tried replacing it myself (which I have done before with other cars I have owned but I couldn't on this car. Too much stuff was in the way.)
Front brakes (pads and rotors). When will GM make a car that does not need a front brake job before 30,000 miles?
Cup holder under the radio broke (cheap design).
General comments?
Overall good car for the money.
Good acceleration.
Good interior and trunk room.
Recommended reviews
| Not bad, but not worth all the trouble it's been |
|
| 1994 - Lumina Standard 3.1 Litre Multi Port Fuel Inje Built to last (if properly cared for) |
| Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Year of manufacture | 1995 |
| First year of ownership | 1995 |
| Engine and transmission | 3.1 Automatic |
| Performance marks | 8 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 8 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 5 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 7 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 0 miles |
| Most recent distance | 43000 miles |
| Date of Entry | 20th September, 2000 |